11/21/2023 0 Comments Thessa solis berkeley![]() References provided to substantiate the contentĪs part of the peer-review process, IJHPM and all its reviewers abide to the confidentiality of manuscripts submitted to journal. Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines ![]() Adding new aspects to the existed field of study What Should be Checked While Reviewing a Manuscript? Authoring a commentary for publication related to the reviewed manuscript Informing the editor if you find the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to your knowledge Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow you identify the authors Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript Treating the manuscript as a confidential document Suggesting alternative reviewers in case you cannot review the manuscript for any reasons Reporting possible research misconducts Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript you are asked to review Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal Providing all required information within established deadlines Reviewing multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary Reviewing manuscript critically but constructively and preparing detailed comments about the manuscript to help authors improve their work If IJHPM’s Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following: ![]() Also, reviewers who consistently exhibit excellent reviews and respond promptly to the editorial requests are considered for invitation to the Editorial Board. In appreciation of your invaluable service to the IJHPM, your name will be included in a list we publish on the webpage of reviewers who have reviewed for the IJHPM. Peer-reviewing will help you keep up with the field and get new understandings that will improve the quality and value of your own studies. IJHPM reviewers’ opinions of manuscripts are invaluable in helping Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board in making their decisions. ![]() We hope that the information provided here will help making your work easier. Maintaining IJHPM as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts. In so doing, IJHPM needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts with a turnaround time of about 6 weeks. IJHPM adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid, fair, and ensures a high quality of articles published. Hence, IJHPM’s Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) Guide for Reviewers How to Review a Manuscript via the IJHPM Portal?.What Should be Checked While Reviewing a Manuscript?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |